Mumford Wood vs Rehau

Average Price

£1,067

Mumford Wood

£590

Rehau

U-Value

1.2 W/m²K

Mumford Wood

1.1 W/m²K

Rehau

Warranty

10.0 years

Mumford Wood

10.0 years

Rehau

Customer Rating

4.5/5

Mumford Wood

4.6/5

Rehau

Mumford Wood vs Rehau: Summary

When comparing Mumford Wood and Rehau windows, several key differences emerge. Mumford Wood, established in 1954, offers windows with an average U-Value of 1.2 W/m²K at an average price of £1,067. Meanwhile, Rehau windows average 1.1 W/m²K U-Value at £590.

Mumford Wood windows come with an average warranty of 10.0 years, compared to Rehau's 10.0 years. Customer satisfaction ratings show Rehau ahead at 4.6/5, while reliability scores give Rehau a slight edge.

Both manufacturers offer smart glazing technology and produce windows suitable for different property types. Mumford Wood is based in United Kingdom, while Rehau originates from Germany.

Detailed Comparison

Mumford Wood
Rehau
Average Price
£1,067
£590
U-Value
1.2 W/m²K
1.1 W/m²K
Energy Rating
A
A+
Average Warranty
10.0 years
10.0 years
Reliability Score
4.6/5
4.7/5
Customer Satisfaction
4.5/5
4.6/5
UK Market Share
4.0%
12.0%
Established
1954
1948
Country of Origin
United Kingdom
Germany
Smart Glazing Technology
High Efficiency (U-Value ≤ 1.2)
Extended Warranty Options

Who Should Choose Mumford Wood

  • Tech-savvy homeowners wanting smart glazing features
  • Those who prefer to support UK manufacturing
  • Homeowners looking for classic casement window designs

Who Should Choose Rehau

  • Homeowners valuing customer satisfaction and after-sales support
  • Homeowners wanting access to a wide network of approved installers
  • Those looking for windows with exceptional reliability

Scenario Fit: Which Brand Fits Your Situation?

Best for budget-first upgrades

Rehau is generally the lower upfront-cost option in this comparison.

  • • Better for large multi-window projects with tighter budget caps
  • • Useful when payback speed matters more than premium extras
  • • Pair with installer quote comparisons to lock value

Best for long-term ownership

Mumford Wood currently leads on warranty depth in this matchup.

  • • Better fit if you plan to stay in the home 10+ years
  • • Prioritises lower maintenance surprises over time
  • • Stronger risk control for exposed or high-traffic elevations
Decision LensLikely Better ChoiceWhy
Upfront budgetRehauLower average price in this pair.
Energy performanceRehauLower U-Value typically means stronger heat retention.
Maintenance risk framingMumford WoodLonger average warranty can reduce long-tail ownership risk.
User-rated confidenceRehauHigher customer satisfaction score in current data.

Popular Window Models

Mumford Wood Popular Models

ModelTypeMaterialRatingU-ValuePrice
Conservation RangeCasementTimberA1.2 W/m²K£900
Contemporary RangeCasementTimberA+1.1 W/m²K£1000
Traditional RangeSliding SashTimberA1.3 W/m²K£1300

Rehau Popular Models

ModelTypeMaterialRatingU-ValuePrice
Total70cCasementuPVCA+1.1 W/m²K£520
Rio Flush FitFlush CasementuPVCA1.2 W/m²K£570
GeneoTilt and TurnuPVCA+1.0 W/m²K£680

Approved Installers

Mumford Wood Installers

Mumford & Wood Installers

4.6

Specialist Installers

Rehau Installers

Rehau Authorised Partners

4.7

Authorised Partners

Energy Efficiency & Cost Savings

More energy-efficient windows can significantly reduce your heating bills. Based on average UK energy prices and a typical 3-bedroom house:

Mumford Wood

Average U-Value

1.2 W/m²K

Lower is better for heat retention

Energy Rating

A

Estimated Annual Energy Savings

£318

Compared to older single-glazed windows (typical U-Value 5.8)

Rehau

Average U-Value

1.1 W/m²K

Lower is better for heat retention

Energy Rating

A+

Estimated Annual Energy Savings

£338

Compared to older single-glazed windows (typical U-Value 5.8)

Frequently Asked Questions

Ready to get new windows?

Compare quotes from approved installers in your area